In a tech-focused world, innovation can be achieved through finely-tuned rapid development and cost management. This is precisely the role that Shifting Left in FinOps serves. It is more than just a FinOps term for tech experts; it encompasses a philosophy that integrates finance and operational activities in a nearly seamless manner within the earlier processes of the value chain. If you wish to promote innovation and spend less money in the process, this last part of the series will be highly useful.
Building from the first part where we discussed the Shifting Left FinOps Strategies Framework, and the second part where I explained the core concepts of left shifting, this post focuses on the shortcomings, tools, and transforms concerning practice of these concepts.
By the end of this blog, you’ll have a set of skills needed to implement Shifting Left FinOps in your organisational structure to help you save money, work better, and more importantly, encourage innovation.
Recap of Part 1 & 2
Before the dissection of the topic “Shifting Left” is begun, here is a summary of the main points highlighted in the preceding posts.
Part 1: The Principles of FinOps
This emphasised the integration of finance, engineering, and operations functional areas as a cardinal towards achieving effective cloud cost management. Integration, Cloud and spend visibility, and accountability were the main highlights.
In this second part, we will discuss shifting left with the extremes of engineering.
I examined earlier in this document what shifting left means in engineering – it is to integrate cost responsibility during the early development stages of a product. Collaboration during the initial stages guarantees that cloud spending and resource allocation become sensible actions rather than actions that need to be fixed later.
Let us look at the astonishing possible value that both innovation and cost containment can achieve through left shifting.
What are the Advantages of Moving Left in FinOps?
For large businesses that have to deal with numerous cloud systems, Shifting Left in FinOps is beneficial. It encourages organisations to integrate financial understanding much earlier in the engineering processes, allowing tech teams to operate more efficiently and with much more cost effectiveness.
- Early Recognition of Spend
Engineers not only understand systems better, but they have a higher understanding of how it costs to design a system which greatly reduces the chances of being blindsided by overspending. This knowledge lessens unexpected budget shortfalls or cost leaks.
- Faster Innovation Turnaround Times
Providing financial context at the top of the pipeline minimises wasteful cost rework and enables better efficiency. Earned time is time where engineers don’t spend countless hours troubleshooting systems, putting features, and innovations out more frequently.
- Improved Inter-Team Collaborations
Shifting Left promotes collaboration between finance and development as well as product teams. This helps make certain that the frameworks, tools, and decisions support both innovative and financial objectives.
- Preventing Inefficient Use of the Cloud
Cloud environments often become financially expensive unchecked due to a multitude of reasons (idle resources, etc.). Cost forecasting and optimisation at early stages prevents expenditure waste.
Helpful Ways to Shift Left in FinOps
Remember that changing how you execute Shifting Left FinOps does not happen instantly. It requires cohesive planning and collaboration amongst several cross-functional units. Though, here’s where to begin:
Inform and Emancipate Your Staff
Make sure your engineering teams know the fundamentals of FinOps so they gauge its importance and take financial responsibility.
Organise sessions targeted at introducing tools for budgeting and cost allocation.
Take Advantage of Cost Projection Tools during Initial Stages of Development
In the earlier phases of projects, make use of cloud-based cost estimation platforms like AWS Cost Explorer, Azure Cost Management, or GCP Budgets. This helps teams to estimate impacts in advance.
Cap Budgets on CI/CD Pipelines
Add FinOps barriers to Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) practices. Programs should be fitted with budget limiters or notification systems predicting overspending.
Have FinOps Advocates
To facilitate change in operations, appoint some advocates for FinOps from the engineering and finance departments. These advocates can spearhead the process of integrating FinOps during design reviews, sprint planning and architecture conversations.
Incorporate Cost Effectiveness into KPI Objectives
Ensure that your team’s KPIs (Objectives of Key Performance Indicators) go beyond the usual achievement or delivery targets to also include the aspect of cost effectiveness and resource optimisation. This guarantees responsibility at all tiers.
Case Studies In Success
FinOps has sceptics, does it really work? If you still need convincing, here are some great examples.
Case Study 1: Retail Tech Company Reduces Cloud Spend By 30%
A well-known retail tech company utilised the Shifting Left approach by embedding budget spending on cloud resources within the product’s life cycle. By implementing resource caps prior to system deployment, they managed to curb cloud expenditures by 30% and reinvested the savings into research and development.
Case Study 2: SaaS Company Empowers Developers With Data
An engineer at a SaaS company was provided with detailed information on cloud resource spending while building products. In addition to eliminating bottlenecks in the rollout process, they were able to shorten the time to release New Features by 25%, saving the company an estimate of millions of pounds in cloud resources each year.
Obstacles And How To Overcome Them
There is no paradigm shift without its own challenges. When working through Shifting Left strategies, keep in mind the following concerns:
Cultural Resistance
People not used to thinking about cost may resist integrating those measures. Solution: Promote conversations and explain the reason for the Shifting Left FinOps. Provide Shifting Left FinOps examples that highlight its importance.
Tool Awareness Gap
FinOps is met with a lack of familiarity among engineers. Solution: Provide training and ensure there are user-friendly tools for easy access and adoption.
Overloaded Engineering Teams
The problem of expecting engineers to manage operational expenses while completing their normal work is intimidating.
Solution: Develop automated systems for planning and allocation to lessen manual intervention.
Technological Tools For Shifting Left FinOps
Try the following tools for easier accomplishment of your FinOps transformation objectives:
Cost Estimation and Allocation Tools
Cost Explorer for AWS
Cost management for Azure
Budgets for GCP
Budget monitoring through pipelines for CI/CD
Harness
CloudZero
Collaborative and Reporting Tools
Apptio Cloudability
Finout
What lies ahead for Shifting Left in FinOps
The growth of cloud services and the availability of intelligent applications has great potential for re-engineering the processes of FinOps. The notable upcoming trends are:
Cost Forecasting Through Artificial Intelligence
AI models will support teams in estimating cloud spending with utmost efficiency in the foreseeable future.
Optimising cloud resource usage with little to no human supervision.
Use of AI models to optimally allocate and utilise cloud resources without human intervention.
Greater Integration of Teams
It is expected that apart from engineering, the principles of FinOps will also be part of sales, product, and business strategy development.
What makes Shifting Left FinOps a smart business decision
By embedding financial consideration at the beginning of planning processes, Shifting Left FinOps eliminates excessive spending while enhancing innovation and collaboration between technology and finance.
It is the responsibility of tech leaders and FinOps practitioners to embrace shifting-left paradigms as they relate to the future of cloud financial management. It is necessary, not for innovative advancement, but because it is fundamentally more intelligent.
Is the time right to increase the level of your organisation’s FinOps strategy? After laying the groundwork for Shifting Left, there is a need to transform from financial burdens into innovative possibilities.
Indicate Annotated Bibliography materials here.
